*event picts* July 23 – 24 : CS Gallery & Events

Gallery owner Daniel Colvin of CS Gallery & Events held a preview reception on July 23, and the full scale opening night on July 24. Included here are a few pics from both nights as well as a couple of shots of Cosby and Daniel hanging work for the show.

image linked to image gallery

Daniel also put up a nice little web store for the show here. Prints are available for purchase via the online store, or by contacting me directly at dk@scissorcircus.org.

See CS Gallery online storefront for full image pricelist.

Posted in Art, Art & Film, Columbus, Events, photography | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Photography Exhibition: opening July 23rd-24th, 2010

My friends  Cosby Lindquist & John Antjas and I will be showing our work together in a group show to open July 23 & 24 here in Columbus… at a new gallery in Old Town East.

Image from "Grounded" series

GROUNDED • 26

Our work hinges on landscape practice, and spans both time, and the digital/analog divide. The pieces I’ll be showing mark a milestone in reproducing previously destroyed prints of the US military airplane boneyard.

Please join me for an evening of music, art, and food. I will be at both receptions (23rd & 24th), and would love to see you there.

New photography at CS Gallery and Events, 66 Parsons Ave., Columbus Ohio, with music by Trains Across the Sea and others, care of Organ Grinder Productions.

CS Gallery & Events
66 Parsons Ave, Col. OH 43215
Across from Carabar

Preview: July 23 • 7 to 10pm
Opening: July 24 • 7 to Midnight
Posted in Art, Art & Film, Columbus, Events, photography | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Interview: The Fuse Factory's Alison Colman

Premier issue of Columbus’s newest online magazine, AI The Artists Interview

ColmanInterview_FuseFactoryLogo

Alison Colman is the Director of The Fuse Factory, a media arts incubator taking shape amidst the local intersection of art, technology, industry and education. The Fuse Factory was begun in 2008, with the expressed purpose to function as an incubator for innovation, interaction, collaboration, critical thought, diversity, and artistic exploration.

How could I not be intrigued? Indeed. In the month of October alone, The Fuse Factory is offering workshops in Flash Animation, Scratch (creative programming for kids), Paperduino, Actionscript, and Stop Motion Animation! And they are all incredibly affordable, for all of us blue collar, or no collar, creatives.

Check out my full interview at Theartistsinterview.com

http://www.theartistsinterview.com/2009/10/by-daniel-king.html

Thanks to Stephanie Sypsa for cooking up this Artists Interview web magazine.

Posted in Columbus, Interviews | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

LINE OF FLIGHT: A CONVERSATION ON LOVE

Local artists have floating conversations… will audience give chase?

Date:
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Time:
4:30pm – 6:30pm
Location:
JOIN US! Meet us on the quad on CCAD’s campus.
Street:
Corner of Cleveland Ave. and E. Gay St.
City/Town:
Columbus, OH

VITALforms is a collective comprised of Cassandra Troyan and Nicole Langille.

On September 26 they [will] float through the sky in a hot-air balloon in an act that utilizes collected texts, poems, letters and improvised speech to make an amplified conversation between two bodies. Situated in close proximity to each other in the balloon basket and at a distance with viewers positioned on the ground, this action examines the vulnerability inherent in speaking, the ways we communicate emotion, and the disconnections made between us–no matter how close or far apart from one another.

Viewers on the ground choose to continue in the conversation as they chase (or not) VITALforms, negotiating with the limitations of moving across the earth’s surface in opposition to the drifting words and unrestricted motion of the two bodies in the hot-air balloon basket, apart together.

This action is part of the Descent to Revolution rolling exhibition, through the Bureau for Open Culture at CCAD.

DescentBlog

Watch for event pics, as I will be attending. ~ DK

Posted in Art, Columbus, Events | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Arts Journalism, here-now-free?

The Future of Arts Journalism is Here… Maybe

An interesting article found at www.technologyinthearts.org

I, for one, find it incredibly encouraging that journalists are finding new paths to write about the arts in the face of the layoffs and budget cuts. As the newspaper industry struggles, the first cost-cutting measures always seem to involve pulling more things from the wire and less local reporting.  Many of us in the arts industry have felt the burn from the epidemic of local arts critic firings from major papers, or conversion to a part-time or freelance status. In turn, people find it less satisfying to read the paper as these local writers are cut and circulation decreases further as more people choose to go online to read wire reporting rather than pay for it in paper form. In an effort to save themselves, it seems as though the papers are cutting the very thing that makes them a viable business model.

So how does this decrease in arts journalism affect your local arts organizations? Arts orgs lose out in two major ways: 1) One of their advertising mainstays becomes less effective as less potential performance /exhibit-goers see the orgs’ ad in print and 2) as more critics are cut from newspaper payrolls, coverage of arts events is decreased. Since reviews and articles are typically a great revenue generator, arts orgs find themselves hurting for objective reporting and distribution that their own blog doesn’t quite cover. But through the Summit, the search is on for the new model of profitability in this brave new paperless, everything-free-and-now world.

I find these conversations inspiring, seeing as though my impressions of Columbus’s depth of creativity in proportional to its lack of coverage of said creativity. Arts writers, critics, and reviewers are not making much of a living these days. That leaves us all without meaningful local content. I for one am exhausted from all the promotional, press released, and tidbit sized conversations being had in our local arts media.

I believe that folks want meaningful discussion. Fewer simplistic explanations and increased thoughtful consideration when dipping into the human creative work of out local community.

So don’t feel so bad about confronting the everything-free-and-now architecture in which journalism will live.

~ DK

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Next up… interview with Robert Trautman

Robert Trautman

Robert Trautman

Coming in one week, if all goes well and I play my cards right, I’ll bring you the next installment of my OH Intro interview series… local graphic designer/photographer/artist Robert Trautman.

Traut knows way too many insightful people in Columbus, and has the kind of personality that draws you into conversation. He is usually excited about one thing or another, wearing his brand of creative energy like a well tailored shirt. It fits.

What’s that? You HAVE noticed the series of photographic centerfolds in the new OUTLOOK COLUMBUS (monthly) calendar? Well… this is Robert’s handiwork. Making free publications collectible again. full interview and slideshow coming soon.

September should be chocked full of Columbus shinanigan-makers, muck-rakers, and activist bakers. (?) Mostly, I want to mention that I have been working on the September selections, due to post very soon, in succession, with pride.

Until then, check out Independents Day activities downtown on Saturday evening (Sat. Sept 20). I’m taking my kids – and you should too! Take yours… not mine.

I mean – how can you say NO to such tastie-treats as…

Movies on the Block (including short films from area filmmakers such as Matt Meindl!),

Hula Hoop Mania (Artist Aaron Hibbs goes for the gold, bringing Guinness to town in an attempt to break the world hula hoop record!)

Art Squatters (Friends from the OSU MFA art program take over several vacant spaces downtown to display their works.)

…And way more than I am going to post here.  (LOCAL MUSIC, LOCAL FOOD, LOCAL BUSINESSES, LOCAL EVERYTHING)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Karl Mechem, Indie Publisher

Karl Mechem, publisher of Journal of Short Film

Karl Mechem, publisher of Journal of Short Film

Columbus is home to many inspired creatures, engaging in multifaceted often overlapping worlds of creative production. I met Karl Mechem in 2006, as he was entering his second year publishing a quarterly collection of short films.

Karl’s inspiration came from, among many sources, a trip to Mali in 2004 while shooting a low-fi documentary film. Upon meeting another filmmaker doing much the same thing, he recognized the revolutionary access to the medium due largely to the falling cost of DV [digital video] production. Karl began wondering how audiences would ever see all of these new films.

Karl Mechem: Democratized film making really called for democratized distribution, so it wasn’t rocket science to start a DVD journal.  But there was also a longstanding need for more distribution of short film, in general.

Oh wait, I also blame the 2004 election and the sick feelings afterward.  Oh, and the fact that I just wanted to see more short film and how better to do so than to ask for submissions.

Plus I was bored and marginally employed.  There’s never really just one origin to anything, is there?

Daniel King: The films distributed through the Journal cover such a diverse landscape… from more or less straightforward documentaries, to extremely personal narratives and even animation and cutting-edge experimental work. Even within a single volume (7-10 films) the blend of visual languages, stories, and themes is surprising.  Can you talk to me about your choices in the curation process for the Journal?

KM: That diversity is no accident.  Quick note: the journal’s editors are the real experts, and I’m just the publisher; the thoughtful reviewing/curation is more their work than mine.  But yes, mixing all of the genres together makes for eclectic volumes.  I hoped it would create something more than the sum of the parts.  Historically, all film genres have influenced the others, so it made sense to put the best films in each category next to each other.  Sometimes you can see solid evidence of cross-pollination, sometimes you just hope you can encourage it.

It feels like judging apples and oranges, sometimes, since all of the submissions are so different.  But as long as there is quality and thought and creativity there, we’re happy.  I’ve heard some complain that the volumes are a little head-spinning, but I think that’s healthy.

“I think in a few years filmmakers and -viewers will have many more options via a much more decentralized digital world, including options that are economically sustainable.” – KM

DK: To what extent do the films on the Journal represent local talent?

KM: Including local talent has never been part of our mission, which is why it’s so remarkable that there have been many people from the area in the JSF. I won’t list any names lest I leave someone out, but every couple volumes someone from c-bus or central Ohio is included. And, considering we’re publishing some of the best short films made worldwide, that’s an impressive ratio. It’s great proof that there is a lot of filmmaking talent in the area.

DK: Today there are many young people wanting to build on models of independent web based film production and distribution, leading to a very different dynamic between the makers and the viewers. Do you have any thoughts on where you see that heading?

KM: I can see this as the future of independent film, but people need to be patient.  Technology has thrown us into a transition period, and it’ll take a while for us to figure out all the options, settle on the best models, and learn the new skills.  (And the audiences will have to catch up, too.)  I think in a few years filmmakers and -viewers will have many more options via a much more decentralized digital world, including options that are economically sustainable.

But that is years away.  In the meantime, filmmakers should spend their time making films and improving themselves.  Thankfully, most artists are familiar with the concept of day jobs, late nights, sharing, volunteering, adapting, coping, and working really hard without any concrete promise (or measure) of “success.”  So I think hard work and patience will win the day.  And probably Google.

JSF_opened_web

DK: So, with that in mind, why is the Journal on DVD and not an online magazine with streaming video?

KM: Quality and permanence, mostly. In 2004 the quality of streaming video was awful. We’ve always tried to present the films at the highest quality possible, and even DVD is a compromise.  Short film deserves a permanent spot on our bookshelves, right next to the other books and DVDs.

So the DVD format seemed like a good, cost effective solution. But now, digital delivery can give us both quality and permanence (on hard drives, anyway), so we’re certainly considering it.

DK: Tell me about some of the collaborative volumes, in which the Journal has partnered with other organizations for “themed” content.

KM: Most recently, the JSF put out a volume of selections from the Art & Tech residency program at the Wexner Center (Vol.14). That was especially fun since it was curated by Jennifer Lange and Paul Hill who are at the Wexner and who have been a part of the journal from its beginning.

In 2007 we partnered with WITNESS.org to put together a volume of social issues documentaries (Vol.9). WITNESS helps people in hot spots like Burma and Chechnya make and share videos, so that collection was pretty moving and intense.

And in 2008 we put together a volume of films (Vol.11) from Portland, OR, with the help of filmmaker Karl Lind. That place has to be in the top 5 fecund filmmaking scenes in the U.S., and it was great to get a snapshot of it (via 26 films on one volume!).

DK: What is your big picture plan, even outside of your work with the Journal?

KM: While I want to finish a couple personal film projects, in general I think I’ll be moving more toward the application side of the film and media world.  I’m more interested in education and pedagogy, these days, and those fields are in desperate need of reform.  I like finding the intersections between fields and seeing how ideas and methods can be shared.  Education could benefit a lot from more visual and digital tools.

Hmm, what else?  I’m also writing a screenplay for Transformers 3 that has even more transforming robots than ever.

But if I had a million dollars I’d probably just sink it into a bamboo farm or synth-meat research or an org. that gives out micro-grants to entrepreneurs and punks for projects and mayhem.

MORE:

Volume 15 premiered in July, review here

www.thejsf.org

JSF on Facebook

Posted in Art & Film, Columbus, film, Interviews, JSF | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Journal of Short Film, A Democratizing Voice

JSF_Vol15Banner

A short stack of 7 films, The Journal of Short Film Volume 15 includes animated love letters, intimate earth worm conversations, and stunning historic vistas.


The Journal of Short Film is a locally published quarterly DVD collection of short video/film from around the world. In its newest volume, #15, the Journal continues its voice of democratized film distribution, while offering a selection of films along the perimeter of both experimental and documentary practices. I’m honored to be supporting the Journal of Short Film’s publisher Karl Mechem, and more recently as a guest editor on this volume, alongside Jennifer Lange and Paul Hill of the Wexner Center.

The volume begins with the quiet visually poetic Chiquitita and the Soft Escape, by Michael Robinson. Repetitive texture and motion reveal details at home, memories in close-up, cues that disintegrate with each repeated telling. The filmmaker offers an apt description of the “gentle breakdown in the face of the romantic.”

Chiquitita and the Soft Escape, by Michael Robinson

Chiquitita and the Soft Escape, by Michael Robinson

Hyacinthe, by Lydia Moyer (goodfornow)
Whats remains of Jonestown, Gayana? Moyer travels to the remains of the Jonestown “Peoples Temple Agricultural Project,” to discover a landscape of legendary violence, a historic tragedy swallowed by the natural world. This short documentary makes a case for time as a factor in both healing and subverting history.

Melika Bass stirs up something primordial with the 5 minute Bulb in the Head. A metaphysical day in the park. Humans and worms explore the earth, and dirt produces magic. Described in liner notes as  “An earthen fairy tale. A feast for the living.”

A Pastry Shop And A Rainy Street, Bruce McKaig

A Pastry Shop And A Rainy Street, Bruce McKaig

Bruce McKaig‘s experiments in time lapse video on A Pastry Shop And A Rainy Street, make for an interesting overlap between interior and exterior space. Check more of Bruces time lapse photography and video art (here).

Within the playful space of a minute and a half, Digital Underpants by Matt Meindl exposes a playfully animated romp through old love letters and notebook sketches. A secret message, as if from the desk of a small child, layered with meaning and whispered innuendo.

How much difference can one man make? Recycle by Vasco Lucas Nunes and Odi Timoner describes a kind of homesteading on a small tract of unused land.  Recycle is a Sundance short documentary about a homeless poet who recycles for his own reasons, and gardens in a wedge of existence between two streets in the Echo Park neighborhood of Los Angeles. (clip)

Self sustainability becomes a prayer to the viewers as we celebrate the small gifts. Applaud the water hose, a ravaged plant rescued from the dumpster, and the curbside gardener.

One of my favorite short films in the collection is 200,000 Phantoms. A 20th century history exploded through hundreds of photographs of the Genbaku Dome in Hiroshima, spanning a century or more. A thought provoking statement in layered images, Phantoms leaves me pondering over a new language found in our ever increasing collective public documentation. The filmmaker, Jean-Gabriel Périot, brings us something fresh  in the ubiquitous form of a slide show. Phantoms is a truly transcendent piece that remains with me long after a single viewing.

Purchase your own copy of this DVD collection online at www.thejsf.org, or on Amazon.com

UP NEXT… Interview with the Journal’s publisher, Karl Mechem!

Links

thejsf.org
Amazon
Michael Robinson

Matt Meindl

Lydia Moyer

Jean-Gabriel Périot

Bruce McKaig

Posted in Art & Film, Columbus, film, JSF | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Matt Meindl, Films Made By Hand

MM_Banner

Matt Meindl, in his own words is a kind of “hodgepodge filmmaker.”

Matt’s films are self-conscious and quirky, often including the filmmaker himself through image, voice, or narrative. Matt and I each returned to our hometown of Columbus a few years ago, and met one another shortly there after. I conducted this recent interview via email.

———————————————–

Daniel King: Tell us a little bit about yourself, and what you’re currently doing.

Matt Meindl: Well, I’m very tall which makes it hard to find pants. When I was a teenager I started making monster movies with friends and eventually ended up at the University of Toledo, in the film/video program. The films I saw there by Chel White, Ann Marie Fleming and others really changed my idea of what a film could be and I began pushing myself to make work that was more personal and intricate.

I moved back to Columbus after graduating and have pretty much continued on that track. I’m currently trying to finish an experimental super 8 film that I’ve been shooting off and on for something like 5 years now called Inside Out/Side One. It’s a big nostalgic chunk of images and bits that are both old-timey and infinite. I’m trying to see how far I can take collage-style animation before I get bored with it. I’m also writing a new film about a regretful mummy.

Still from "Digital Underpants," by Matt Meindl (linked to streaming video)

Still from "Digital Underpants," by Matt Meindl (linked to streaming video)

DK: Your films blend a variety of visual languages, like stop motion 
animation, still images and eclectic film stock. Years ago, these 
were hallmarks of low budget filmmaking… but today it seems digital video is more economical than ever. What appeals to you about these practices?

MM: Yeah, I’m kind of a hodgepodge filmmaker. I’m always trying out different techniques and creating my own hybridized methods for animation, editing etc. The processes can be pretty tedious and shooting on 16mm and super 8 [film] may seem archaic but I think there is a certain look/feel/energy that is harder to achieve with digital media. Video is swell and cheap and practical but it’s also becoming more and more automated — which means that the results sometimes have less personality. But I’m not a total film purist; I shot Digital Underpants on HDV and I have all my film transferred to video for editing now.

So I sort of exploit what I like about both formats. I think it’s foolish to outright dismiss one or the other. People keep telling me that super 8 is disappearing but Kodak keeps releasing new stocks. In fact, there are more super 8 film stocks available now than in the 1970’s when the format was in its heyday!

DK: Recently you performed a live soundtrack to your film Mumble-Baby. That film strikes me as playful, but deeply personal… almost secretive. Can you tell me a bit about the imagery?

MM: Some of the imagery, especially the saturated sunset, was inspired by Richard Wright’s book “Uncle Tom’s Children” which I was reading at the time. Mumble-Baby was a student film that I made while I was both falling in love and listening to lots of prewar blues. So yeah, love and blues… two things that are emotionally resonant but also mysterious and elusive.

In the film, the wandering bluesman is always silhouetted in the distance, out of reach. You can never really get a handle on the blues because the world it grew out of is all but gone, which I guess makes it easy to romanticize. And love is even more intangible.

Still from "Mumble Baby," by Matt Meindl (linked to streaming video)

Still from "Mumble Baby," by Matt Meindl (linked to streaming video)

I think the playful aspects of the film come from using an optical printer to do the visual effects. Optical printing is an inexact science at best but can be great for experimentation.

I tried all kinds of techniques including multiple-exposure, bi-packing the film, re-photographing at different frame rates and blowing up super 8 to 16mm. I like to perform live music with it now because my singing on the original soundtrack is sort of embarrassing.

DK: Talk to me about where your recent film, T-Shirt of Me, comes from.

MM: T-shirt of Me is a super 8 comedy short with a pretty simple premise: what to do when someone gives you a t-shirt with a picture of your own face on it. It’s the idea that a lot of embarrassment and some grim social implications can arise from a silly novelty gift. Such a thing has never happened to me exactly but I have been in plenty of awkward situations that I over-analyzed to the point of ridiculousness, much like the main character (played by Natalie Lloyd) does.

The story came from Lyn Elliot, who teaches film at Penn State. We’d never met but I had seen her shorts at film festivals and thought they were uniquely funny. I read somewhere that she was interested in writing for other people so I contacted her, thinking we’d be a good creative match.

She emailed me the story and I wrote the screenplay from that so it was sort of a correspondence collaboration. I also showed Lyn an early version of the film and she suggested several cuts be made which improved things greatly.

T-shirt of Me recently screened at the Wexner Center for the Arts, the Boston Underground Film Festival and got an Honorable Mention at The United States Super 8 + Digital Video Festival.

DK: Do you know if Lyn saw any of your short films before writing the story? The subject seems well suited to your visual language.

MM: I mailed her a DVD with a few of my films so that she could decide if I was someone she wanted to work with. She hadn’t previously seen any of my shorts. And yeah, there is definitely a similar sensibility in our work. We both find humor in the mundane.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtfcq3QlgJc]

“Filmmaking used to feel like an imaginary friend but now it’s more like a Siamese twin.” – Matt Meindl

DK: If I handed you a million dollars today, how would you spend it?

MM: I ate lunch with Peter Kubelka once when he visited UT and he told me very politely, “You cannot earn a living making experimental films.” I put down my sandwich.

Kubelka is a significant avant-garde filmmaker whose work is preserved in the Library of Congress and even he has a hard time paying the bills.

So I have no grand illusions about making much money at this. I’m beginning to apply for grants and residencies but I’ll keep making films the way I want regardless ‘cause it’s too much fun and I’ve got lots to learn still. Filmmaking used to feel like an imaginary friend but now it’s more like a Siamese twin. Also, if you gave me a million dollars I’d take you out to Red Lobster. My treat.

DK: What have you seen in terms of the local film production community in Columbus?

MM: I can’t tell if Columbus’ film culture is expanding or if I’m just getting out more, but it does seem like there is a fair amount of new work being made and screened here. There are people making professional-quality (at least technically) shorts and features, trying to compete in the global film market. There are folks creating video art, installations and experimental work. I fall somewhere in between the two. In fact, I do a lot of my shooting alone in my apartment, hunched over my rickety animation stand. I think that sorta keeps me on the fringe of things, for better or worse.

My friend Sean McHenry is someone I like working with. I’m also a fan of Stacie Sells and Cassie Troyan who you recently interviewed.

There are other interesting people with fine arts backgrounds who are getting into filmmaking now and doing cool things. I’d like to believe that there is at least some degree of mutual respect among all of these folks as we’re all fighting a lot of the same battles for creation and community support.

DK: Filmmaking is often a highly collaborative process, requiring many hands to make short work of a huge multi-spindled beast. You’re willing to go it alone. Can you talk to me about the creative benefits of working alone in your studio?

MM: Films like Digital Underpants and Inside Out/Side One were made with no script or structure in mind. I was just going on feeling and instinct. And as I filmed I began to see a movie forming and tried to follow it to a satisfying end. Working off-the-cuff like that is much easier to do alone.

I can just start and stop when I want, shoot more weeks or months later when ideas come, work weird hours or holidays etc. It’s not that unusual, really. I think a lot of experimental filmmakers tend to be fairly autonomous.

Now, for scripted narratives like T-shirt of Me I do assemble a cast and crew because that’s a different kind of production process where you very much need lots of extra hands and brains. Those shoots tend to be more memorable ’cause of the friendships that develop and the creative energy that everyone drums up. And sometimes there’s catering.

DK: What keeps you creatively motivated when the energy runs low, or the money runs out?

MM: If I’m feeling low or lazy I might work on some element of a film that’s just busy-work like cutting out pictures or digitizing footage. That way I can still get a little something done each day. Working by myself on animated stuff is actually a great way to keep from going broke because it’s such a slow process and there’s so much for me to do that I can barely shoot more than a roll or two a month. So my expenses get spread out over several months or more. I do have to be careful though ’cause I pay for everything outta my own pocket.

Screenings & More:

T-shirt of Me will be screening at the Brooklyn Lyceum on July 10th as part of a Flicker NYC show (Flicker NYC)

Digital Underpants will be included in the Journal of Short Film, Volume 15 which is produced locally, available now, and includes works from 6 other filmmakers from around the world. (Journal of Short Film – http://www.thejsf.org/) (PS dear readers, an interview with its publisher coming soon!)

Matt’s MySpace filmmaker page: Updated list of screenings, DVD’s for sale, or watch selections of his shorts.

You won’t regret supporting a local filmmaker by picking up Matt’s DVD of T-Shirt of Me & Digital Underpants (in much higher, crystal clear resolution than the myspace versions) thru his Myspace page.

FACEBOOK – Befriend Matt at Facebook.com/optyprinty

Posted in Art & Film, Columbus, Interviews, JSF | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Interview with P. Tepper, Painter

PTepper Studio Composition by Daniel King

Large-hearted, fearless, quixotic, profoundly imaginative

P. Tepper’s personality is a painterly reflection of the inspirational figures he often quotes: Picasso, Madeleine L’Engle, Mark Ryden, and Dr. Seuss. Since moving to Ohio in 1997 he’s settled into what he calls a nondescript building tucked in the shadows of an American city. He and I were roommates in college. We’ve remained in touch at irregular intervals, the most recent of which when I caught up with him for this interview.

Daniel King: What’s your background?

P. Tepper: I grew up in Maryland, a small town in the mountains. Came to Columbus, Ohio to go to the Columbus College of Art and Design, and stayed here ever since. I’ve been living in a Carriage House in the Discovery District, downtown for the last 5 and a half years.

When I was 15 I wanted to do animation. I took a storyboarding class and hated it. At the same time, a friend of mine, Mariano Santillan, was studying painting and illustration. We would paint together. He was my biggest influence as a student. When you live life with someone, they can really influence you, as opposed to an artist’s work that I view in a book, or online. That’s a view from a distance. The living artists that inspire me are Mark Ryden, and Joe Soren. Van Gogh and Picasso are the big dead guys, I love them.

DK: Where does your imagery come from?

PT: I began a practice of drawing every single day. I’d scribble and sketch for an hour, spend an hour doing more structured drawing, and then an hour of color. I pick from these drawing for my painting ideas.

panel from Prayer series

Image from Prayer series, P. Tepper 2009


DK: Are your paintings an attempt to express a pre-concieved idea? Or is the act of painting more open ended?

PT: Robert Henri believed that the goal isn’t to make art, but to live life. Art is evidence of a life lived. As far as walking up to an easel and beginning to paint, its more like dancing. There are certain steps you have to learn. As you learn the steps with your partner, you grow together.

No, I don’t start with a preconceived idea. Painting to me is like dancing with God. A collaborative process. There is that, often mentioned, invisible presence when making art. The best I can do is get out of the way.

DK: What is the idea behind this new series of paintings?

PT: The primary subject matter is the love between the man and the woman, and the problem is how to pull out the different aspects of that relationship. I try to represent it as fiery, passionate, and magical.

This new series I’m calling “variations on the theme of love”, represents Jesus and the church. Jesus is fierce, dangerous and powerful, but when he’s with his lover he doesn’t bruise or harm her. I’ve experienced God’s love. He can be loving and tender when I don’t deserve it. He’s big. I often use gold color to represent his presence within a painting.

Variations on the Theme of Love

Variations on the Theme of Love, P. Tepper 2009

DK: Instead of painting the series of images one after another in succession, your approaching them all at once. Like in the silkscreen process. Can you talk to me about the process?

PT: I am inspired by pop surrealism, artists like Mark Ryden, Joe Soren; these artists as well as (more recently) Andy Warhol, Shepard Fairey, and the printmaking process. Beginning with a single motif and expanding on it through a series of variations. Only I don’t do printmaking, I paint.

I complete step one and two all at once, lay down flat color and add the drawing across all 15 paintings. I then step out of that routine from this point forward. Usually if I paint something over and over again, it gets better and better each time. To avoid this I keep switching them around so that they’re all equally mediocre. (laughs)

Renoir painted light coming through leaves on a tree. There is a random fleck-i-ness which imitates nature. This is difficult to do. Even though all of my paintings are similar, I wanted them each to have a random pattern of light like leaves in a tree. Each similar yet different.

Also I don’t want to be a factory line worker, what I’d rather do is birth 15 children.

DK: All at once?

PT: Right.

DK: That’s painful…
So, this self imposed structure allows you to play with the painting process?

PT: Let’s say there’s a particular thing in one version that needs to be pulled out, highlighted, while the painting beside it cries out for attention to a different detail. They all may share common characteristics, but maintain their differences.

What I’m trying to work on is my versatility while focusing across 15 panels. I can work in an impasto approach in this one and use thin glazes in another. Keeping grounded within one common image allows me to focus on the act of painting without being distracted by subject matter.

DK: Your imagery seems to represent a spiritual expression for you. Why don’t we see more traditional iconographic (Judea-Christian) symbols, from art history, in your work?

PT: As far as traditional iconography of Christian artwork from history, I have no interest in repeating that. Someone once said that creativity may simply be the virtue of seeing that there’s no benefit to repeating what’s already been done. The classical images from the history of Christian art spoke to the generation in which they were made. I am speaking to my generation. I’m looking for innovative, provocative images. I like that I’m able to paint images of and about God. Just as the painters from history did for their culture. I’m carrying it forward.

I’m less influenced by popular culture. What I like about pop surrealism is not the pop references, but the fresh approach to surrealism. These artists aren’t repeating Salvador Dali.

DK: How do mythical creatures function in your work?

PT: I love CS Lewis. The Chronicles of Narnia uses mythical creatures to tell a relevant story. A great painting is a view of the invisible. A painters job is to pull the curtain back and to allow people to see this other world. I believe this other world is real.

Last year I was riding my bicycle around town a lot. I had these dinosaurs around me. They were flying, they had lasers and were breathing fire. They were my companions, I’d talk to them. It was so much fun! Like Dr. Seuss and CS Lewis used literature to pull the curtain back, I use painting to try to do the same thing.

DK: Do you keep a dream journal?

PT: I do, but my characters don’t come from my dreams. While I don’t dream about those creatures at night, I imagine them all day long. As I said, while I’m riding around on my bicycle I’m seeing dinosaurs and when walking through parks and gardens the trees are talking, having conversations. Even in my studio there are these ankle biters. Creatures are part of my waking hour.

Madeleine L’Engle talks about how culturally we have embraced pragmatic thought. If it doesn’t serve a purpose it’s not useful.

While I may not have health insurance, I do have imaginary creatures. We need that beauty.

DK: What keeps the fire going?

PT: Athlete’s careers and abilities peak when they’re young. When you look at artists’ careers, the peak traditionally comes much later, Picasso was in his 50′s when he painted Guernica. Artists, poets, philosophers take in observations of life and process it over a longer period of time. That’s something I keep in mind.

Van Gogh painted when no one wanted his paintings. While I wouldn’t mimic everything he did in life, I do hold on deeply to the fact that, no matter what, he was walking out into a field and painting, then going home and doing all over again the next day. Again and again. That’s the level of commitment painting requires.

I don’t try to fit painting into my schedule, but rather have scheduled my life around painting.

“Do whatever you do intensely.” — (Robert Henri)

DK: What kinds of practical solutions do you have to challenges in the studio? The road blocks…

PT: When painting 15 versions of an image, if one gets frustrating, I can put it aside and work on another for awhile. But when working on a single stand-alone image, it can be much more difficult to decide, is this working? Or should I just scrap it, and start over?

Working with acrylic, instead of oil, facilitates reworking in a much shorter time, if need be. On days when nothing is working, I might take a break from a larger project, to smear cheap paint on a board. Its fun and non-destructive, reminding me of what it was like to be a child with his father.

DK: Tell me about the Clown painting series.

from the Clown Series, P. Tepper, 2009

image from the Clown Series, P. Tepper, 2009

PT: Through my drawings, I began adding eyes to make creatures out of scribbles. Once I had my invented characters, I began painting different versions, with a range of painting approaches.

DK: This image series has a loose playful energy, more so than the others. How do you know when a painting is finished?

PT: I’ve been reminded that the amount of time spent doesn’t make for a stronger finished painting. Picasso could, in 15 minutes, do a drawing that was beautiful. Van Gogh would finish a painting in an afternoon.
This allows me to stay loose when it’s right, and add detailed renderings too. Picasso was able to, in a few stokes, capture his idea. In terms of defining when it is done, I don’t know.

DK: Where do you see yourself in 10 years?

PT: I don’t believe I’ll win a million dollars, or hit it big and have the magical “I’ve made it” moment. There may be a parallel between climbing the corporate ladder, slow but sure, and the life of a working artist. My goal is to inspire people, the way I have been inspired by my favorite artists. And it would be nice to also sell enough work to make a living. I just want to contribute.

The past ten years I’ve been developing my skills as an artist. During the next ten I hope to begin effectively communicating the love of Jesus.

EXHIBITIONS

See P. Tepper’s work at The Grandview Hop this Saturday, on the walls of Hedman, Anglin, Bara across from Spagio. map

Sandbox Columbus co-working space at 853 Pearl Alley, stop in to see Paul’s work there as well through July.

On view at the Marcia Evans Gallery, map, throughout July and August 2009. He’ll be in the gallery during the July 4th and August 1st Gallery Hop nights.

CONNECT

twitter.com/ptepper
ptepper.com

Posted in Art, Columbus, Interviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment